On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Alvaro Herrera <
alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> > Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
> > rather different thing:
> > - if (heapRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
> > &&
> > + if (indexRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence ==
> > RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED &&
> > !smgrexists(indexRelation->rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
> > As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch it:
> > the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.
>
> There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
> patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.
>
> Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes. Thanks!
>
