Michael Paquier wrote:
> Btw, perhaps this diff should be pushed as a different patch as this is a
> rather different thing:
> - if (heapRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence == RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED
> &&
> + if (indexRelation->rd_rel->relpersistence ==
> RELPERSISTENCE_UNLOGGED &&
> !smgrexists(indexRelation->rd_smgr, INIT_FORKNUM)
> As this is a correctness fix, it does not seem necessary to back-patch it:
> the parent relation always has the same persistence as its indexes.
There was an argument for doing it this way that only applies if this
patch went in, but I can't remember now what it was.
Anyway I pushed the patch after some slight additional changes. Thanks!
--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
