On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:06 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You have a point but if we see the below logs, it seems the second
> walsender (#step6) seemed to exited before the first walsender
> (#step4).
>
> 2021-08-15 18:44:38.041 CEST [16475:10] tap_sub LOG: disconnection:
> session time: 0:00:00.036 user=nm database=postgres host=[local]
> 2021-08-15 18:44:38.043 CEST [16336:14] tap_sub LOG: disconnection:
> session time: 0:00:06.367 user=nm database=postgres host=[local]
>
> Isn't it possible that pid is cleared in the other order due to which
> we are seeing this problem?
If the pid is cleared in the other order, wouldn't the query [1] return a false?
[1] - " SELECT pid != 16336 FROM pg_stat_replication WHERE
application_name = 'tap_sub';"
regards,
Ajin Cherian
Fujitsu Australia
