> Why does it not allow that? Is that just a limitation of the > compiler? If yes, what is the error happening? This question is not > exactly answered yet as of this thread. I may be missing a reference > about that in the upstream docs, but I see nowhere an explanation > about the reason and the why. That's also one of the first questions > from Thomas upthread.
The following error occurs:
LINK : fatal error LNK1246: '/DYNAMICBASE:NO' not compatible with 'ARM64' target machine; link without '/DYNAMICBASE:NO
This seems to be a deliberate restriction for Arm64 targets. However, no references were provided. To clarify, I have posted a question [1] on the community channel of Visual Studio.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:43:06AM +0100, Niyas Sait wrote: >> This issue is still lying around, and you may have been lucky. Would >> there be any issues to remove this change to get a basic support in? >> As mentioned upthread, there is a long history of Postgres with ASLR. > > MSVC linker doesn't allow non-random base addresses for Arm64 platforms. > It is needed for basic support.
Why does it not allow that? Is that just a limitation of the compiler? If yes, what is the error happening? This question is not exactly answered yet as of this thread. I may be missing a reference about that in the upstream docs, but I see nowhere an explanation about the reason and the why. That's also one of the first questions from Thomas upthread. -- Michael