On 7 April 2016 at 16:45, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Don't know which version of the SQL spec you're looking at,
It was the draft 95 version, cos (being text file) it's easiest to
read :). I'll learn my lesson next time and expand the 2008 one.
> but SQL:2008 has
>
> <update statement: searched> ::=
> UPDATE <target table> [ [ AS ] <correlation name> ]
> SET <set clause list>
> [ WHERE <search condition> ]
[snip]
> The reason why SQL doesn't allow an optional correlation name, and
> probably never will, is the same as the reason why we don't, and probably
> never will: it introduces an ambiguity as to whether you meant a dotted
> set-clause target name to be a reference to a field of a composite column
> or just a noise-word reference to the table's correlation name.
I stand (comprehensively :) ) corrected, thanks for clarifying.
Geoff
