On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 at 15:11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> People don't generally post to the lists after a type-mismatch error
> catches a typo for them. So it's pretty hard to tell about "how
> many" developers would find one behavior more useful than the other.
> It is safe to say, though, that the same developer complaining today
> might have their bacon saved tomorrow.
I've missed off WHERE clauses on a live database (oops) in my time,
and I'm happy to see work being done to safeguard against that
(although I tend to be of the opinion that it's not something you ever
do twice!) but I can confidently state that I've never once been
caught out by being surprised that a number was treated as a boolean.
How could you even write a query like the one Thomas posted? It
doesn't even look remotely sensible.
But I have been caught out by boolean vs int, enough that I bothered
to search out that ALTER statement. And I'm a lazy person at heart, so
if something irritated me enough to bother doing that, you can be sure
it was _really_ irritating me.
Geoff
