Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Matthias van de Meent
Subject Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..)
Date
Msg-id CAEze2WiqY3b_FKSUGV8mDMMu+Neb37aCsvMUvKoYJmfNCs+pqg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..)  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: CREATE TABLE ( .. STORAGE ..)  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 16:51, Aleksander Alekseev
<aleksander@timescale.com> wrote:
>
> Hi hackers,
>
> I noticed that cfbot is not entirely happy with the patch, so I rebased it.
>
> > I see that COMPRESSION and STORAGE now are handled slightly
> > differently in the grammar. Maybe we could standardize that a bit
> > more; so that we have only one `STORAGE [kind]` definition in the
> > grammar?
> >
> > As I'm new to the grammar files; would you know the difference between
> > `name` and `ColId`, and why you would change from one to the other in
> > ALTER COLUMN STORAGE?
>
> Good point, Matthias. I addressed this in 0002. Does it look better now?

When updating a patchset generally we try to keep the patches
self-contained, and update patches as opposed to adding incremental
patches to the set.

Apart from this comment on the format of the patch, the result seems solid.

- Matthias



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kirill Reshke
Date:
Subject: Re: Extensible storage manager API - smgr hooks
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: PGDOCS - Integer configuration parameters should say "(integer)"