On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 4:07 PM Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh.bapat.oss@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If we are not interested in saving memory, there is a simpler way to
> improve planning time by adding a hash table per equivalence class to
> store the derived clauses, instead of a linked list, when the number
> of derived clauses is higher than a threshold (say 32 same as the
> threshold for join_rel_list. Maybe that approach will yield stable
> planning time.
>
PFA patchset with conflict, with latest HEAD, resolved. I have dropped
0005 from the previous patchset since it didn't show any significant
performance difference. Other than these two things, the patchset is
same as the previous one.
--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat