Em ter., 18 de mar. de 2025 às 20:34, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 04:13:15PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote: > Thanks for the report! Yes, it is an oversight on my part.
No worries. It's most likely me while reviewing the whole as I've reordered these blocks a bit while going through the patch.
This has little consequences for the end user, as the read, read_bytes and read_time should show up as 0 instead of NULL in the pg_stat_io view for the two WAL rows. Still it is confusing to show zeros, and it makes queries of pg_stat_io a bit cheaper. Will fix in a bit.
