On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 04:13:15PM +0300, Nazir Bilal Yavuz wrote:
> Thanks for the report! Yes, it is an oversight on my part.
No worries. It's most likely me while reviewing the whole as I've
reordered these blocks a bit while going through the patch.
This has little consequences for the end user, as the read, read_bytes
and read_time should show up as 0 instead of NULL in the pg_stat_io
view for the two WAL rows. Still it is confusing to show zeros, and
it makes queries of pg_stat_io a bit cheaper. Will fix in a bit.
--
Michael
