Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 22:14, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu:
Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 22:05, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu:
Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 21:54, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 09:34:45PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: > It's not critical code, so I think it's ok to use strlen, even because the > result of strlen will already be available using modern compilers. > > So, I think it's ok to use memcpy with strlen + 1.
It seems to me that there is a pretty good argument to just use strlcpy() for the same reason as the one you cite: this is not a performance-critical code, and that's just safer.
Yeah, I'm fine with strlcpy. I'm not against it.
Perhaps, like the v2?
Either v1 or v2, to me, looks good.
Thinking about, does not make sense the field size MAXPGPATH + 1.
