Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 22:05, Ranier Vilela <ranier.vf@gmail.com> escreveu:
Em dom., 23 de jun. de 2024 às 21:54, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> escreveu:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 09:34:45PM -0300, Ranier Vilela wrote: > It's not critical code, so I think it's ok to use strlen, even because the > result of strlen will already be available using modern compilers. > > So, I think it's ok to use memcpy with strlen + 1.
It seems to me that there is a pretty good argument to just use strlcpy() for the same reason as the one you cite: this is not a performance-critical code, and that's just safer.
