Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Thomas Munro
Subject Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date
Msg-id CAEepm=1oOAx-RFup9phv-b0k+Y3ic0dC-htpW5cNG_OMTpOR_w@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2018-08-23 22:02:26 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 23/08/2018 03:31, Andres Freund wrote:
>> > On 2018-08-22 17:09:05 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> >> Attached is a version doing so.
>> >
>> > Mildly updated version attached. This adds an explanatory commit
>> > message, removes one stray docs C89 reference, and fixes a mis-squashing
>> > of a patch.
>>
>> Let's do it!
>
> Pushed the first two.  I'll send the presumably affected buildfarm
> owners an email, asking them whether they want to update.

Note that designated initialisers are not in C++ yet (though IIUC they
have been accepted in P0329R4[1] for the draft that will become C++20
whatever it turns out to be).

[1] http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2017/n4691.html

-- 
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Hint to set owner for tablespace directory
Next
From: "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan GCS Delivery)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Proposal to add work_mem option to postgres_fdw module