Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date
Msg-id 20180824014434.qourppnik7bmsib6@alap3.anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2018-08-23 22:02:26 +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 23/08/2018 03:31, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2018-08-22 17:09:05 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> >> Attached is a version doing so.
> > 
> > Mildly updated version attached. This adds an explanatory commit
> > message, removes one stray docs C89 reference, and fixes a mis-squashing
> > of a patch.
> 
> Let's do it!

Pushed the first two.  I'll send the presumably affected buildfarm
owners an email, asking them whether they want to update.


Greetings,

Andres Freund


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Optional message to user when terminating/cancelling backend
Next
From: Haribabu Kommi
Date:
Subject: Re: Pluggable Storage - Andres's take