Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
Date
Msg-id eedbe1a9-1d3f-e878-7695-fe9b529f3239@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Windows vs C99 (was Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c)
List pgsql-hackers
On 23/08/2018 03:31, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2018-08-22 17:09:05 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Attached is a version doing so.
> 
> Mildly updated version attached. This adds an explanatory commit
> message, removes one stray docs C89 reference, and fixes a mis-squashing
> of a patch.

Let's do it!

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: JIT explain output
Next
From: "Bossart, Nathan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Improve behavior of concurrent ANALYZE/VACUUM