On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 2:55 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> > Rebased again. Patches that touch AC_CHECK_FUNCS are fun like that!
>
> Yeah, I've been burnt by that too recently. It occurs to me we could make
> that at least a little less painful if we formatted the macro with one
> line per function name:
>
> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([
> cbrt
> clock_gettime
> fdatasync
> ...
> wcstombs_l
> ])
>
> You'd still get conflicts in configure itself, of course, but that
> doesn't require manual work to resolve -- just re-run autoconf.
+1, was about to suggest the same!
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
