<p><br /> 2012/02/21 0:58 "Kevin Grittner" <<a
href="mailto:Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov">Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov</a>>:<br/> ><br /> > "Albe Laurenz"
<<ahref="mailto:laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at">laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at</a>> wrote:<br /> ><br /> > > I read
theexample carefully, and it seems to me that it is<br /> > > necessary for the read-only transaction (T3)v to be
SERIALIZABLEso<br /> > > that T1 is aborted and the state that T3 saw remains valid.<br /> ><br /> >
Correct.<br/> Hm, agreed that isolation levels < REPEATABLE READ are not sufficient for pgsql_fdw's usage. I'll
examinethe example and fix pgsql_fdw.<p>Thanks.
