Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 4F42193F02000025000458C3@gw.wicourts.gov
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  ("Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
"Albe Laurenz" <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> wrote:
> I read the example carefully, and it seems to me that it is
> necessary for the read-only transaction (T3) to be SERIALIZABLE so
> that T1 is aborted and the state that T3 saw remains valid.
Correct.
> If I understand right, I agree with your correction.
:-)
-Kevin

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Albe Laurenz"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points