On 21 September 2015 at 16:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I wrote:
>> Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
>>> The problem then arises in the final carry propagation pass. During
>>> this phase of the computation, the carry from one digit (which can be
>>> a shade under INT_MAX / NBASE) is added to the next digit, and that's
>>> where the overflow happens.
>
>> Nice catch! I think the comment could use a little more work, but I'll
>> adjust it and push.
>
> After trying to rework the comment to explain what maxdig really meant
> after your changes, I came to the conclusion that it'd be better to do
> it as per attached. Does this look sane to you?
>
Yes that looks better. It's still the same amount of extra headroom
(21), but I think it's clearer your way.
Regards,
Dean
