Re: Bug in numeric multiplication - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Bug in numeric multiplication
Date
Msg-id 2098.1442852061@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug in numeric multiplication  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Bug in numeric multiplication  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> On 21 September 2015 at 16:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> After trying to rework the comment to explain what maxdig really meant
>> after your changes, I came to the conclusion that it'd be better to do
>> it as per attached.  Does this look sane to you?

> Yes that looks better. It's still the same amount of extra headroom
> (21), but I think it's clearer your way.

OK, pushed (after further hacking on the comment ...)
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dmitry Dolgov
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb_set array append hack?
Next
From: Jeevan Chalke
Date:
Subject: TEXT vs VARCHAR join qual push down diffrence, bug or expected?