Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCWPRPA=j68p6F5rAE++_8YDvJcSMNtKrGFM9MFXW8gv_g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c  (Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 22:31, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 18:27, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
> >
> > I think we should wire this up to the buildsystem and our testsuite...  Having
> > testcode that is not run automatically may be helpful while originally
> > developing something, but it doesn't do anything to detect portability issues
> > or regressions.
>
> Yes, perhaps we should convert src/tools/testint128.c into a new test
> extension, src/test/modules/test_int128

Here's an update doing that (in 0001). 0002-0005 are unchanged.

Regards,
Dean

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Melanie Plageman
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix some inconsistencies with open-coded visibilitymap_set() callers
Next
From: Bertrand Drouvot
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding basic NUMA awareness