Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dean Rasheed
Subject Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c
Date
Msg-id CAEZATCVN=v3yo2snzhc4Y=v=pe4YiJHR6QVDhsJY7_hGy60vjg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improving and extending int128.h to more of numeric.c  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 at 18:27, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
>
> I think we should wire this up to the buildsystem and our testsuite...  Having
> testcode that is not run automatically may be helpful while originally
> developing something, but it doesn't do anything to detect portability issues
> or regressions.

Yes, perhaps we should convert src/tools/testint128.c into a new test
extension, src/test/modules/test_int128

Regards,
Dean



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: CHECKPOINT unlogged data
Next
From: Sami Imseih
Date:
Subject: Improve LWLock tranche name visibility across backends