Le lun. 5 oct. 2020 à 12:22, PegoraroF10 <marcos@f10.com.br> a écrit :
I have tables which are Master Detail and usually my program loads all detail records of a master record. So I configured CLUSTER on all those detail tables to use an index which is the relation with master table. With that I can load less records to Shared Buffers because all detaild records are on sequencial pages, that´s fine.
I know that to have this working I have to periodically run CLUSTER, ok too.
But today instead of CLUSTER I just ran VACUUM FULL. How vacuum full recreates entirelly that table, like cluster does, I thought it would use that index too, but didn´t. I didn´t see what sequence of records it did but was not the one I´ve configured with cluster.
Is that expected or Vacuum should obbey cluster configuration ?
Only CLUSTER obeys cluster configuration. VACUUM FULL in particular doesn't.
