Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes
Date
Msg-id CAE2gYzxcmz_o9SnGBv2De3gK2ECodxHdsDctntLkMSLsswuYDA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes  (Oleg Bartunov <obartunov@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> Spgist index tree is much better  than gist - 12149 pages vs 1334760 !

I assume this is the reason why it is bigger.  IP addresses are very
well suited to SP-GiST.  They naturally do not overlap.

> I also noticed, that spgist is much faster than gist for other inet
> operators. I'd like to see in 9.6.

Unfortunately, I missed the deadline of the last commitfest.  It is on
the next one:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/10/571/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes
Next
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench small bug fix