Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Emre Hasegeli
Subject Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date
Msg-id CAE2gYzw4gkN+33C-t-Bz8O2uAr12UDE++AWft5EsLBF9UrAi6Q@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types  (Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
List pgsql-hackers
> BTW how did we end up with the regression differences? Presumably you've
> tried that on your machine and it passed. So if we adjust the expected
> file, won't it fail on some other machines?

I had another patch to check for -0 inside float{4,8}_{div,mul}().  I
dropped it on the last set of patches, so the tests were broken.  I
get -0 as a result of -x * 0 both on Mac and Linux.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica/ proof of concept
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Performance improvements for src/port/snprintf.c