Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
Date
Msg-id 12819.1534532191@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types  (Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types
List pgsql-hackers
Emre Hasegeli <emre@hasegeli.com> writes:
>> BTW how did we end up with the regression differences? Presumably you've
>> tried that on your machine and it passed. So if we adjust the expected
>> file, won't it fail on some other machines?

> I had another patch to check for -0 inside float{4,8}_{div,mul}().  I
> dropped it on the last set of patches, so the tests were broken.  I
> get -0 as a result of -x * 0 both on Mac and Linux.

I'll bet a good deal of money that you'll find that does not hold
true across the whole buildfarm.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs