2013/1/29 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 29 January 2013 13:30, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote:
>
>> It makes unavailable to control execution of
>> functions from viewpoint of selinux, and here is no way selinux
>> to prevent to execute functions defined by other domains, or
>> others being not permitted.
>> Also, what we want to do is almost same as existing permission
>> checks, except for its criteria to make access control decision.
>
> Do you have a roadmap of all the things this relates to?
>
> If selinux has a viewpoint, I'd like to be able to see a list of
> capabilities and then which ones are currently missing. I guess I'm
> looking for external assurance that someone somewhere needs this and
> that it fits into a complete overall plan of what we should do. Just
> like we are able to use SQLStandard as a guide as to what we need to
> implement, we would like something to refer back to. Does this have a
> request id, specification document page number or whatever?
>
I previously made several wiki pages for reference of permissions
to be checked, but it needs maintenance works towards the latest
state, such as newly added permissions. http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/SEPostgreSQL_References
Even though selinuxproject.org hosts permission list, it is more
rough than what I described at wiki.postgresql.org.
http://www.selinuxproject.org/page/ObjectClassesPerms#Database_Object_Classes
Unlike SQL standard, we have less resource to document its spec
being validated by third persons. However, it is a reasonable solution
to write up which permission shall be checked on which timing.
Let me revise the above wikipage to show my overall plan.
Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>
