Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kohei KaiGai
Subject Re: cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8
Date
Msg-id CADyhKSWrqM3MCCEBgbWocSmK5Xkvww9rkxD9JcVjUL=B9rf0rw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
Responses Re: cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Also, cash_pl, cash_mi, cash_mul_int4 and so on... does not have overflow checks
like as int8pl has.

Of course, most of people don't need to worry about 64bit overflow for
money... :-).

2015-10-08 0:03 GMT+09:00 Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>:
> I noticed cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8 are defined in cash.c,
> however, pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h contains no relevant entries.
>
> Is it just a careless oversight?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>



-- 
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8
Next
From: Euler Taveira
Date:
Subject: Re: Small documentation fix in src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/po/pt_BR.po