Re: cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8
Date
Msg-id 25060.1444230570@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8  (Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Kohei KaiGai <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp> writes:
> I noticed cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8 are defined in cash.c,
> however, pg_proc.h and pg_operator.h contains no relevant entries.

> Is it just a careless oversight?

Hm.  I'd be inclined to fix that by removing the dead code, since
it's evidently useless.  For that matter, I doubt we need the int2
and flt4 variants; might as well depend on automatic promotions.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: bugs and bug tracking
Next
From: Kohei KaiGai
Date:
Subject: Re: cash_mul_int8 / cash_div_int8