On 31 May 2013 02:52, Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> wrote:
> Testing 9.3beta, it seems that array_remove() may return an empty 1-d
> array whose upper bound is lower than its lower bound. I know that we
> discussed allowing this kind of array, but I don't think that
> discussion reached any conclusion, other than to agree that the
> current empty 0-d array behaviour would be kept in 9.3.
>
That's right, zero-D is still the only supported representation of an
empty array, so when array_remove() yields an empty array it ought to
be zero-D. Good catch.
Cheers,
BJ
