Though I will agree that slony is a nice and a great tool w.r.t. replication (specifically selective replication). But I would dis-agree on below points:
* Cascading replication chains (a really big deal when you want
multiple slaves in the secondary facility and don't want to hog
your bandwidth)
Really? which version of Postgres are we talking about? I think cascaded replication facility is available since v9.2
* Quick and easy movement of the master to any of the database in
the cluster without destroying replication.
Again, which version? Re-mastering is made simple in v9.3.
* Seeding of new slaves without interrupting existing nodes (assuming
your hardware has a little free capacity)
AFAIK, streaming replication does not cause any interruption while you add a new node.
* Selective replication of tables, potentially in complex arrangements
where some tables are replicated to only to A and some only to B
and some to A and B, etc, etc.
Agree.
In general I do not like trigger based (replication) solutions for huge clusters [this is my personal opinion and does not necessarily indicate my employer's opinion ;-)] and for databases which has huge write volume specifically if you do bulk insert/delete/update operations.
I think if it's slony or streaming replication will depend on below factors:
1) The change-set that you want to replicate contributes how much of your total change set? e.g. on a per minute basis if it's 70% or above, I will recommend you to go for streaming replication
2) Do you have too many tables to be added to replication set? lets say above 70% of your total tables needs to be replication (unless rest 30% have high write operations), then go for streaming replication
3) Do you too many bulk operations happening on the tables which needs to be replicated
4) To some extent your choice will be influenced by the motivation behind replication, DR, HA, reporting application (esp if you are particular about replicating only selective tables for reports)
There are few easier ways of managing a slony cluster:
