Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?
Date
Msg-id CADK3HHLCM25LM+SwOU-vqVg_cUJXJfoL0dcNWrQaRqfVVM1aLg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Responses Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?  (David Pirotte <dpirotte@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view
David,

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 at 00:22, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:18:23PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> A test verifying that a non-transactional message in later aborted
> transaction is handled correctly would be good.

On top of that, the patch needs a rebase as it visibly fails to apply,
per the CF bot.
--
Michael

Where are you with this? Are you able to work on it ?
Dave Cramer 

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Move OpenSSL random under USE_OPENSSL_RANDOM
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Batch/pipelining support for libpq