Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?
Date
Msg-id 20200924042230.GK28585@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Any objections to implementing LogicalDecodeMessageCB for pgoutput?  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 12:18:23PM -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> A test verifying that a non-transactional message in later aborted
> transaction is handled correctly would be good.

On top of that, the patch needs a rebase as it visibly fails to apply,
per the CF bot.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: Attempt to make dbsize a bit more consistent
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: The ultimate extension hook.