Jonas,
Thanks for the patch. I've had some time to look at it. One problem I
am running into is creating a test case for it.
Currently all of our test code is in the test.org.postgresql....
package(s) however I can't get access to one of the protected methods
from there.
I'm thinking we should move all of the test code into
org.postgresql.... package and drop the test. This would give us the
ability to create unit tests on more methods
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:34 AM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:
> I should have some time to look at this.
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
>
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Jonas Sundman <jonas.sundman@thl.fi> wrote:
>> On 2012-02-08 02:31, Kasia Tuszynska wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello jdbc mailing list,
>>>
>>> We are using: version 9.0-801
>>>
>>> I found that the inconsistent behavior we were expariancing with
>>> getTablePrivileges, has been logged as a bug and listed on :
>>> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/todo.html
>>>
>>> *[bugs]* ACLs have changed format since the parsing code was written. The
>>> code
>>>
>>> only supports 7.3 style ACLs. DatabaseMetaData methods like
>>> getTablePrivileges
>>> do not work correctly against later servers
>>>
>>> I was wondering if there is a timeframe by which this issue would be
>>> resolved.
>>>
>>
>> Indeed I wrote a patch to the acl parsing which I submitted some time ago
>> <http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/2011-08/msg00071.php>.
>>
>> Now that the git move has been successfully done, is there a chance that
>> someone could review the patch at this point?
>>
>> A quick check against 9.1 worked fine, also.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jonas Sundman
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
