That would be awesome!
Dave Cramer
dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
http://www.credativ.ca
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Sebastian Hennebrueder
<usenet@laliluna.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can understand your points and will put the refactoring idea aside but do
> what I originally wanted - help with the missing JDBC 4 things.
>
> --
> Best Regards / Viele Grüße
>
> Sebastian Hennebrueder
>
> -----
> http://www.laliluna.de
> Java software developer and trainer for Hibernate and Java Persistence
>
> Am 28.03.2012 um 06:54 schrieb Lew:
>
> Sebastian Hennebrueder wrote:
>
> Maven repositories as a common way to store open source artifacts
>
>
> as are Ant-based projects
>
> and is easier to manage using Maven.
>
>
> Depends.
>
> I've seen Maven projects that were a complete cock-up to manage.
>
> Ant or Maven, the biggest issues I've encountered involved obfuscation of
> dependency chains.
>
> Maven build projects can be easily imported into any IDE (Eclipse, Netbeans,
> IntelliJ)
>
>
> As can Ant-based projects.
>
> If I want to work on the project, I can be up an running in seconds by
> checking out and importing a Maven project into my IDE
>
>
> Ditto Ant-based.
>
> without the need to understand the details of a Ant build
>
>
> I am always deeply dubious of any argument that touts "without the need to
> understand" as a virtue. This dubiety has yet to disappoint.
>
> and excluding paths to be considered as source code.
>
>
> Sorry, but that is necessary to Maven-based projects, too.
>
> --
> Lew
> Honi soit qui mal y pense.
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
>
