Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Version question - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject Re: Version question
Date
Msg-id CADK3HH+PjeJS8DDJwy6WJd-sFEUjJ7Y6j=yq3tA9GSO9Sr-=Gg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Version question  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Version question  (Christopher BROWN <brown@reflexe.fr>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Tree view
My thoughts:

releasing 9.5 is the path of least resistance.
Ideally we announce that we are going to release version 42.x.y. however nobody will pay attention until their build breaks.
Then we will get a flood of messages implying that we broke their build.

My gut says to go with 42.x.y, my head says it will be easier to take the easy way out and release 9.5.x




On 14 March 2016 at 10:05, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, what if we indeed release 9.5.x just to note that "it is at
least helloworld-compatible with backend 9.5"?

I guess as long as pgjdbc's versions are "close" to backend's
versions, users would be confused if those are compatible.
So it looks we either have to release pgjdbc 9.5.x, or release
something like 42.x.y

Any thoughts?

Vladimir

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Vladimir Sitnikov
Date:
Subject: Re: Version question
Next
From: Christopher BROWN
Date:
Subject: Re: Version question