Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Phil Sorber
Subject Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Date
Msg-id CADAkt-j1CwmmnTiBN+EfdJrn1sWJBo6TtW8dU-7MV6X7pbH3Zw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote:
>> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
>> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
>> it will get plenty of debate on it's own.
>
> I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding?
>

It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to
be able to get the right output for host:port. It works, but I don't
really like it all that much, honestly. I also submitted a patch to
add on to libpq to handle this, but Alvaro posed some questions I
don't have good answers for. So I actually have another patch brewing
that I actually like, but I need to put the finishing touches on. I
plan on submitting that later this morning.

> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: src/ports/pgcheckdir.c - Ignore dot directories...
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)