Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Date
Msg-id 20130205140642.GA5753@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)  (Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)  (Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Phil Sorber escribió:
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote:
> >> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
> >> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
> >> it will get plenty of debate on it's own.
> >
> > I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding?
> >
>
> It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to
> be able to get the right output for host:port.

Surely the idea is that you can also give it a postgres:// URI, right?

--
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Next
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)