Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Phil Sorber
Subject Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Date
Msg-id CADAkt-g6mp9DhWv0fPP1U499D3fMThD8L=eO=6d089ngjGLTyQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Phil Sorber escribió:
>> On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:55 PM, Phil Sorber <phil@omniti.com> wrote:
>> >> OK, here is the patch that handles the connection string in dbname.
>> >> I'll post the other patch under a different posting because I am sure
>> >> it will get plenty of debate on it's own.
>> >
>> > I'm sorry, can you remind me what this does for us vs. the existing coding?
>> >
>>
>> It's supposed to handle the connection string passed as dbname case to
>> be able to get the right output for host:port.
>
> Surely the idea is that you can also give it a postgres:// URI, right?

Absolutely.

>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: src/ports/pgcheckdir.c - Ignore dot directories...