Re: Replace (GUC_UNIT_MEMORY | GUC_UNIT_TIME) with GUC_UNIT in guc.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Replace (GUC_UNIT_MEMORY | GUC_UNIT_TIME) with GUC_UNIT in guc.c
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoDxEBXwY=tbePez96_56ud4J+DJ+oxmbOczncfX3KyJJw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Replace (GUC_UNIT_MEMORY | GUC_UNIT_TIME) with GUC_UNIT in guc.c  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:02 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 4:47 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 03:38:10PM +0800, Richard Guo wrote:
> > > +1.  BTW, it seems that GUC_UNIT_TIME is not used anywhere except in
> > > GUC_UNIT.  I was wondering if we can retire it, but maybe we'd better
> > > not.  It still indicates that we need to use time units table.
> >
> > Some out-of-core code declaring custom GUCs could rely on that, so
> > it is better not to remove it.
>
> +1 not to remove it.
>
> I've attached the patch to fix  (GUC_UNIT_MEMORY | GUC_UNIT_TIME)
> thing, and am going to push it later today to only master branch.

Pushed.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joel Jacobson"
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we want a hashset type?
Next
From: "Sho Kato (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: Fix a typo in rewriteHandler.c