Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoDcUZfh=D05gwmG9_=uqAjH7AiVwqP8geMn=nZ=DpVupA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements  (Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements  (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 5:18 PM Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The following review has been posted through the commitfest application:
> make installcheck-world:  tested, passed
> Implements feature:       not tested
> Spec compliant:           not tested
> Documentation:            not tested
>
> The patch looks good to me. With regards to the code comments, I had pretty similar concerns as already raised by
Dmitry;and those have already been answered by you. So this patch is good to go from my side once you have updated the
commentsper your last email. 

For the 0001 patch, since ReindexIndexInfo is used only within
ReindexRelationConcurrently() I think it’s a function-local structure
type. So we can declare it within the function. What do you think?

Regards,


--
Masahiko Sawada
EnterpriseDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Luc Vlaming
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel Inserts in CREATE TABLE AS
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: poc - possibility to write window function in PL languages