Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoDPmy=uSVcY1=FXuG4KE_dBWAF-mYgQp5DsfnLAF88X7g@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 5:50 PM, Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Thank you for pointing out.
>> Yeah, I agree that the twophase regression test should not be
>> performed by default as long as the default value of
>> max_prepared_transactions is 0. Similar to this, the isolation check
>> regression test does same thing. Attached patch removes sql/twophase
>> from schedule file and add new type of regression test.
>
> Would it be possible to include it in "make check"? Any check that
> needs manual interaction will not be executed nearly is often as the
> others and become much less useful imo.
>

Yes. I added two-phase commit test to "make check" test schedule while
adding new two type of test.

Regards,

--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs

Attachment

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #14512: Backslashes in LIKE
Next
From: privat@ingbert-juedt.de
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] BUG #14593: Service doesn't start