Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG
Date
Msg-id 1489762248.2065.5.camel@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
> Thank you for pointing out.
> Yeah, I agree that the twophase regression test should not be
> performed by default as long as the default value of
> max_prepared_transactions is 0. Similar to this, the isolation check
> regression test does same thing. Attached patch removes sql/twophase
> from schedule file and add new type of regression test.

Would it be possible to include it in "make check"? Any check that
needs manual interaction will not be executed nearly is often as the
others and become much less useful imo.

Michael
-- 
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael at xmpp dot meskes dot org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL



pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Kuntal Ghosh
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] [HACKERS] Two phase commit in ECPG
Next
From: Osahon Oduware
Date:
Subject: [BUGS] QGIS Seem To Bypass PostgreSQL/PostGIS User Privileges/Permissions