Re: Should we have a "Testing" topic in the CF app? - Mailing list pgsql-www

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Should we have a "Testing" topic in the CF app?
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoC36N32CxBf+JMf+dK_fbjbHkEm+TGtkNSnpKZejQ3JZQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Should we have a "Testing" topic in the CF app?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Responses Re: Should we have a "Testing" topic in the CF app?  (Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>)
Re: Should we have a "Testing" topic in the CF app?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-www
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 4:40 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > On 1 Aug 2022, at 13:58, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>
> > Unless there are objections raised I can go and create that topic.
>
>
> Done.  I took the liberty of moving one of the TAP test patches over just to
> check that everything worked as intended.

Thanks!

Skimming the CF entries, the following patches can be moved to the new
Testing category:

* Unit tests for SLRU
    * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3608/
* Improve TAP tests of pg_upgrade for cross-version tests
    * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3649/
* CI and test improvements
   * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3709/
* add test: pg_rowlocks extension
    * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3724/
* Testing autovacuum wraparound
    * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3729/
* pgstattuple: add test for coverage
    * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3793/
* Introduce wait_for_subscription_sync for TAP tests
    * https://commitfest.postgresql.org/39/3780/

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



pgsql-www by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we have a "Testing" topic in the CF app?
Next
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Should we have a "Testing" topic in the CF app?