Re: Fix a comment in worker.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Masahiko Sawada
Subject Re: Fix a comment in worker.c
Date
Msg-id CAD21AoB8M4yFQtpjLAqbQkvVJewS1FjN_D5jPX3MvaegP8LSHQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix a comment in worker.c  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 1:48 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > While reading the code, I realized that the second sentence of the
> > > following comment in worker.c is not correct:
> > >
> > >    /*
> > >     * Exit if the subscription was disabled. This normally should not happen
> > >     * as the worker gets killed during ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DISABLE.
> > >     */
> > >     if (!newsub->enabled)
> > >     {
> > >         ereport(LOG,
> > >                 (errmsg("logical replication apply worker for
> > > subscription \"%s\" will "
> > >                         "stop because the subscription was disabled",
> > >                         MySubscription->name)));
> > >
> > >         proc_exit(0);
> > >     }
> > >
> > > IIUC the apply worker normally exits here when the subscription is
> > > disabled since we don't stop the apply worker during ALTER
> > > SUBSCRIPTION DISABLE. I've attached a patch to remove it.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, I also have the same understanding. Your patch LGTM. I'll push
> > this unless someone thinks otherwise.
> >
>
> Pushed.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Masahiko Sawada
EDB:  https://www.enterprisedb.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix a comment in worker.c
Next
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Timeout control within tests