Re: Fix a comment in worker.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Kapila
Subject Re: Fix a comment in worker.c
Date
Msg-id CAA4eK1JSzM3fhxCAQq=4K9W6xUiFvhq2cWos1X2d7WwU2gMUjg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Fix a comment in worker.c  (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Fix a comment in worker.c  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 4:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 5:57 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > While reading the code, I realized that the second sentence of the
> > following comment in worker.c is not correct:
> >
> >    /*
> >     * Exit if the subscription was disabled. This normally should not happen
> >     * as the worker gets killed during ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... DISABLE.
> >     */
> >     if (!newsub->enabled)
> >     {
> >         ereport(LOG,
> >                 (errmsg("logical replication apply worker for
> > subscription \"%s\" will "
> >                         "stop because the subscription was disabled",
> >                         MySubscription->name)));
> >
> >         proc_exit(0);
> >     }
> >
> > IIUC the apply worker normally exits here when the subscription is
> > disabled since we don't stop the apply worker during ALTER
> > SUBSCRIPTION DISABLE. I've attached a patch to remove it.
> >
>
> Yes, I also have the same understanding. Your patch LGTM. I'll push
> this unless someone thinks otherwise.
>

Pushed.

-- 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dilip Kumar
Date:
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Next
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix a comment in worker.c