Re: [SQL] Better way to sort a JSONB array? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Michael Moore <michaeljmoore@gmail.com> wrote:

json_table2 is declared as a variable in pgsql. It is not a jsonb table column. It is loaded from a statement like:
execute 'select  jsonb_agg(row_to_json(zzz)) from (...extremely complex query goes here) zzz' into json_table2;

Later, additional rows are added like:

 for a in select * from [table with the same columns as json_table_2]

  loop

      json_table2 = coalesce (json_table2 || jsonb_agg(row_to_json (a)),  jsonb_agg(row_to_json (a)) );

  end loop;

So, because of the fact that the json_table2 is appended to in a random order, json_table2 now must be sorted. 

thanks

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Steve Midgley <science@misuse.org> wrote:

On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Michael Moore <michaeljmoore@gmail.com> wrote:

This works, but surely there is a better way to do it:

 select jsonb_agg(row_to_json(alias)) from 

       (Select * from jsonb_populate_recordset(null::tx_portal, json_table2) order by portal_name) alias 

                                                           into json_table2;

It sorts the json_table2 array in "portal_name" order. 

I'm confused why you can't just pull portal_name from the json structure using "->"? For example, assuming your json structure that looks like:

{"portal_name": "some data.."}

And a table that looks like:

| id | json_field |

Wouldn't this sql work:

select * from json_table

order by json_field->'portal_name'

Can you provide the final structure of json_table2 in DDL or similar? 

If "->" isn't right (b/c it's an array), would "->>[n]" work (if you know the array element you want to sort by - presumably "0")? That would sort by the first element in the array.

I'm just confused about your question (and knowing you know a ton about Postgres), as to why, once you have a stable table structure in json_table2, why you can't just use standard sql and json operators to pinpoint the data you want and order on it..