On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 5:20 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> The reason I don't think is possible is that we have no infrastructure
> that allows us to tag functions or operators so that non-null input(s)
> mean non-null outputs. We only have strict, which means null input
> means null output. That's the opposite of what we'd need. It might
> only be possible with a NULLS NOT DISTINCT index.
>
Thank you for pointing out "non-null input(s) mean non-null outputs" .
I didn't think about it at all.
regarding v10.
you placed remove_useless_groupby_columns right after add_base_rels_to_query
makes so much sense.
so we can be safely use cached RelOptInfo->indexlist, RelOptInfo->notnullattnums
overall it didn't find any issue.