Re: SQL:2011 application time - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From jian he
Subject Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date
Msg-id CACJufxEwcjWpmoCb_9Y4vVEF7p0WqCwiBja8ePFDUtEJtLYmAA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to SQL:2011 application time  (Paul A Jungwirth <pj@illuminatedcomputing.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 8:35 AM Paul Jungwirth
<pj@illuminatedcomputing.com> wrote:
>
> Your patch had a lot of other noisy changes, e.g.
> whitespace and reordering lines. If there are other things you intended to add to the tests, can you
> describe them?

i think on update restrict, on delete restrict cannot be deferred,
even if you set it DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED.
based on this idea, I made minor change on
v32-0002-Support-multiranges-in-temporal-FKs.patch

other than that, v32, 0002 looks good.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Masahiko Sawada
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: automating RangeTblEntry node support