On 21.03.24 10:51, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> At this point, I'm not too stressed about pressing forward with these
> last two patches. We can look at them again perhaps if we make
> progress
> on a more compact node output format. When I started this thread, I
> had
> a lot of questions about various details about the RangeTblEntry
> struct,
> and we have achieved many answers during the discussions, so I'm happy
> with the progress. So for PG17, I'd like to just do patches 0001..0005.
>
> Patches 1 thru 5 look good to me
Thanks for checking. I have committed these (1 through 5) and will
close the commit fest entry.
